0 is understooded relative to quantity. The empty can be understooded only relative to matter or physical and space.
That is why, the idea of nothing have, however, a content it is not merely negation, in addition is the negation of all that is .
On the other hand, we must to understand that the idea of nothing is something material, is a material state of a material system.
Only together it is inteligible.
~ single have not any meaning.
Even single, ~ have a content, although not a meaningful content.
On the other hand, we must to understand that the idea of nothing is something material, is a material state of a material system.
Therefore, the idea of nothing does not involve an ideatic nothing.
However, we can think somehow at the idea of absolute nothing positive content, but this idea is not content-empty. We can anticipate the idea of absolute nothing, but we cannot arrive to it
My fundamental idea is that
there can be no absolute empty-content idea
But, the content can come from many sensorial systems, not only from visual system.
And, many animals have contents.
I think that, that there are animals with better senses than humans
That is, why mental opertations/processings/computations
are very important.
As was argued by Quartz and Sejnowsky in The neural basis of cognitive development , evolution of cognition lead to a more flexible capacity of forming free representation but, as they argue, development also involve an increase of the complexity of representations not a reduction to nothing
Therefore, a depeer understanding of everithing involve more logical/scientific/rational coerence of all that is from bothom to top.
Nothing cannot increase the inteligibility. I fear that idea of nothing is a sterile one.
Metaphysics=chemistry.
Metachemistry=biology.
Over there idea of nothing
About the relation between any posible mind and human brain
1.Human brain is a concretmaterialisation of an ontologically posible system.
2.
